To assess the first three hypotheses, Pearson’s correlations were used with partial correlations used to account for the effect of state anxiety (state score from the STAI . Tests of normality showed that all variables were normally distributed and hence suitable for this parametric test, except for the following: fixation count to head and body, dwell time to the head and background and time to first fixate the body. For correlations where one variable was not normally distributed both Pearson’s (r) and Spearman’s (rs) analyses were conducted and reported. Partial correlations are based on Pearson’s correlation regardless of distribution. All tests are two-tailed.
Performance
Just after pre-operating got took place, the attention movement investigation was checked to possess outliers (analysis factors larger than step one.5 times the latest interquartile diversity to possess confirmed changeable), by exploring boxplots. Brand new rural analysis affairs (n = 19) was indeed excluded for individual study points inside eye-record procedures , composed of cuatro.22% of the full studies.
Hypervigilance
No significant correlation was found between LSAS scores and time to first fixate the head r (16) = .101, p = .709 and the body r (21) = -.062, p = .790, (r s (21) = -.144, p = .522). This remained the case when controlling for state anxiety using a partial correlation, r (13) = .088, p = .754, and the body r (18) = -.070, p = .7710
502, p = .034 (Fig dos) (overlooking condition nervousness) and you will roentgen (15) = -.499, p = .041 (managing getting state nervousness).
Social Media Sites dating sites
There was zero significant relationship ranging from LSAS score and you can earliest fixation duration into human body, roentgen (23) = -.141, p = .521 which was as well as the circumstances when dealing with to have condition nervousness using a limited correlation roentgen (20) = -.133, p =. 556
Avoidance
There were no significant relationships between LSAS scores and dwell time to the head r (28) = -.073, p = .714 (rs (28) = -.132, p = .502) the body r (30) = -.090, p = .637, and the background r (30) = -.231, p = .220 (rs (30) = -.254, p = .175).
Limited correlations along with showed that whenever handling for state nervousness, discover zero extreme relationships between the LSAS results and you may stay time to your head r (25) = -.063, p = .756, you roentgen (27) = -.090, p = .643, and background roentgen (27) = -.231, p = .229.
There was no significant relationship between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (28) = .049, p = .805 (rs (28) = -.055, p = .782), the body r (29) = -.075, p = .700 (rs (21) = -.033, p = .865) and the background r (29) = -.258, p = .176. Partial correlations also showed that when controlling for state anxiety, there were still no significant relationships between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (25) = .068, p = .743, the body r (26) = -.075, p = .704, and the background r (28) = -.258, p = .185
Hyperscanning
A strong inverse dating was discovered anywhere between scanpath size and you can LSAS rating, roentgen (28) = -.483, p = .008 whenever overlooking county nervousness, and stayed when condition anxiety try controlled getting roentgen (26) = -.498, p = .007 (Fig 3).
A powerful negative relationship was receive ranging from complete saccade number and you can LSAS get, roentgen (29) = -.511, p = .005 when disregarding condition nervousness, which stayed tall a when county anxiety is actually controlled to own r (26) = -.516, p = .005. No relationships try discover ranging from indicate saccade amplitude and you may LSAS score although not, roentgen (29) = -.176, p = .362 in the event county nervousness try controlled to have r (26) = -.160, p = .417